Colonial Gardens renovation plan revised, includes slight reduction in proposed units at Kingston complex

Colonial Gardens renovation plan revised, includes slight reduction
in proposed units at Kingston complex
By BRIAN HUBERT BRIAN HUBERT | Daily Freeman
KINGSTON, N.Y. — The city’s Planning Board viewed revised plans for a proposed four-story building with one-bedroom apartments for seniors at Colonial Gardens calling for a slight reduction in units to with one-bedroom apartments for seniors at Colonial Gardens calling for a slight reduction in units to 80.
The revised plans, submitted by the Kingston Housing Authority and its development partner Mountco at the Monday Planning Board meeting, shave off a portion of the fourth floor closest to Flatbush Avenue and a pair of neighboring homes, leaving a three-story corner on this end of the building. Avenue and a pair of neighboring homes, leaving a three-story corner on this end of the building. Himanshu Tailor, a representative with Aufgang Architects who is working on the project, noted this effort to soften the impact of the building on the neighborhood, known as a “setback,” comes at the expense of two apartments resulting in the reduction of units to 80 from the 82 originally proposed.
The project, developed by the Kingston Housing Authority and Mountco, calls for demolishing two existing buildings in the Penn Court “Annex” site at the public housing complex at 206 Flatbush Ave. The existing buildings that would be demolished have 32 studio apartments. Mountco has said that 98 existing units of one, two and three bedrooms at Colonial Gardens will also be rehabilitated as part of existing units of one, two and three bedrooms at Colonial Gardens will also be rehabilitated as part of the project. the project.
City Planner Sue Cahill also suggested they soften this facade by adding windows. Tailor said they could show renderings with that at January’s meeting.
Mountco’s Executive Vice President of Development and General Counsel John Madeo said the revised plans also lowered the building by 2.5 feet, reducing the perceived height to neighbors. He added that plans also lowered the building by 2.5 feet, reducing the perceived height to neighbors. He added that the developers studied going lower, but they ran into problems with a utility easement.
They also presented renderings with landscaping, including evergreen trees and flowers to help screen the project from those traveling down the hill on Flatbush Avenue towards the building and those who live in neighboring homes.
The presentation also showed a number of landscaped “contemplative spaces” that developers hope to use to activate the space outside the building.
Board members seemed satisfied with the modifications to the building and landscape plan.
“This project is definitely moving in the right direction,” Planning Board Chair Wayne Platte Jr. said.
“The landscaping and stepped-back facade made a huge difference,” Board member Robert Jacobsen “The landscaping and stepped-back facade made a huge difference,” Board member Robert Jacobsen added. Jacobsen had presented numerous concerns about the project’s scale and requests for multiple major waivers at November’s meeting.
Board member Kaira Grundig also praised the landscaping proposed.
The board and Mountco and Kingston Housing Authority representatives also discussed what would happen if the fourth floor was shaved off altogether on the Flatbush Avenue side of the building. Tailor cautioned that this would reduce the number of units to 72.
Kingston Housing Authority Executive Director Harolda Wilcox emphasized that the authority wants to get as many units at the housing complex as possible. “The reduction from 82-72 is significant,” Wilcox said.
The board also questioned what would happen if the building was reduced to three floors.
Wilcox noted this would reduce the number of units to 60.
Wilcox emphasized she knows of many seniors living in their cars who are in desperate need of housing options like this project will offer.
Madeo said that larger reductions in the number of units could make the financial situation tighter too, but he stopped short of saying it would derail the project altogether. but he stopped short of saying it would derail the project altogether.
A reduced number of units would not result in higher rents for tenants, he said.
He also warned the board that the state is prioritizing working with Housing Authorities where He also warned the board that the state is prioritizing working with Housing Authorities where municipal leaders are cooperative with these types of projects. A drawn-out planning process could see other municipalities get in line ahead of Kingston, he added. “This board does not want to hold up this project,” Platte said in response.
Madeo said they expect to have requested traffic study by January’s meeting.
A hotel row in Queens is getting a new look. New affordable housing is part of the mix
A hotel row in Queens is getting a new look. New affordable housing is part of the mix.
By Arun Venugopal
On a recent afternoon, sneakered tourists streamed out of the various hotels located along a quiet stretch of Jamaica, Queens. The Radisson, a Hampton Inn, a Residence Inn by Marriott, and erstwhile JFK Hilton just a stone’s throw from JFK Airport represent the future of affordable housing in the city, as well as what is perhaps a missed opportunity.
Months of interior demolition work is concluding at the 350- room Hilton property on 135th Avenue, just east of the Van Wyck Expressway. A massive renovation will soon follow. The structure is set to reopen in October 2025 — not as a hotel, but as a 318-unit housing complex for low-income and formerly homeless New Yorkers.
Creating kitchens in the studio apartments will be a challenge. There’s all sorts of weird esoteric rules in New York City about separating cooking spaces from living spaces, you shouldn’t sleep in a room where people are cooking. But aside from the technical hurdles, Aufgang said there are also grace notes, including the covered pool near the lobby that will soon be turned into a garden. It’s enclosed in glass, it’s going to be a lovely garden.
-Ariel Aufgang, the architect of the Aufgang Architects
The project, known as Baisley Pond Park Residences, is the result of a 2021 state law called the Housing Our Neighbors with Dignity Act, or HONDA. The measure was designed to convert hotels into housing. It took shape early in the pandemic, as the bottom fell out of the city’s hotel industry and tens of thousands of rooms suddenly became empty.

But nearly three years after its passage, housing advocates and others acknowledge that the HONDA program has little to show for it besides the Hilton project, which is being lauded for its planned amenities, services and design, and being lamented because it could very well be a one-off.
Top elected officials like Mayor Eric Adams and Gov. Kathy Hochul were among the project’s champions. In a December 2023 statement, the governor said the JFK Hilton’s transformation into housing would “help to bring our state one step closer to building the affordable, supportive and sustainable homes that New Yorkers deserve.”

“We had this massive window of opportunity,” said Amy Blumsack, the director of organizing and policy at Neighbors Together, which advocates for homeless and low-income Brooklyn residents, “and I think in some ways it was missed.”
The Hilton’s $167 million conversion is partly being paid for by $48 million in state funding – out of the $200 million allocated to HONDA. Housing and development experts say the program faced numerous challenges, including shifting market forces in the city’s hospitality industry spurred by the pandemic, red tape and opposition from unions, as well as insufficient political will to confront New York’s housing crisis. Its course was also affected by the migrant crisis, which started in 2022 as migrants were sent to hotel shelters by the busload.
“HONDA was started with all the good intentions,” said Vijay Dandapani, the president and CEO of the Hotel Association of New York City. But ultimately, he said, the funding was insufficient for the problem it sought to address. “It was not enough to move the needle.”
There are ‘all sorts of weird, esoteric rules in New York City’
Baisley Pond Park Residences will look out on a quiet residential neighborhood, half a mile from the airport. Despite its location near two busy highways and a bustling airport, the area has a placid, suburban feel. The sidewalks are noticeably clean and many of the houses across the street from the hotel sit behind white picket fences. Occasionally, an MTA bus stops nearby to let local residents off or take on tourists from the nearby hotels. The bus stop is conveniently located just 20 or 30 yards from Baisley Pond Park.
According to Slate Property Group, the private developer that acquired the property with its nonprofit partner RiseBoro Community Partnership, 274 of the 318 residential units at Baisley Pond Park will be studios, with 33 one-bedroom apartments and a smaller number of two- and three-bedroom units. Sixty percent of the completed units will be set aside for formerly homeless New Yorkers, while monthly rent for the remaining affordable housing units will range from $784 for a studio to $1,493 for a two-bedroom apartment.
But landing on a hotel property such as JFK Hilton – really any hotel that could be converted to housing under HONDA – wasn’t easy. David Schwartz, the co-founder and principal of Slate Property Group, said the company “looked at every hotel in the city,” but struggled to find sites with “a combination of good, decent rooms that are big enough for people to live in.”
Many potential sites were eliminated because their rooms weren’t big enough to include a kitchen, as is required under the NYC building code. Schwartz said other properties had big rooms but were situated within manufacturing districts, which meant they weren’t zoned for residential purposes. The ideal site, the company recognized, would accommodate at least 150 residents, which meant it could achieve economies of scale.
In many ways, the JFK Hilton, built in 1987, served the needs of the project. In addition to its size, the Hilton was blessed with “a huge lobby” and lounge, “so we have all this space to work with, which is really exciting,” said Emily Kurtz, the vice president of housing at RiseBoro Community Partnership.
The space allowed for the construction of multiple community rooms as well as a computer lounge and fitness room. In addition to staff tasked with onsite programming, there will be social services case managers. This is especially important, Kurtz said, given the population of many of the people who will be living at Baisley Pond Park.
“Residents will be coming directly from the shelter system, folks that have been in shelter for a while,” said Kurtz. “They’ll be provided permanent housing, with a key to a door, independent living and then supported by onsite supportive services staff.”
The entire project will take 21 months to complete, said Schwartz, versus the 36 months had it been a conventional ground-up construction, where the foundation alone might’ve taken six months to complete.
“It’s a lot less work,” said Schwartz, “and the beauty of the hotel rooms is that they all have windows to the outside and that’s really the trick is that they’re already set up. You have an elevator and stairs in the middle of the building, hotel rooms on either side. And it feels like an apartment building.”
Ariel Aufgang, the architect of the site, said creating kitchens in the studio apartments will be a challenge.
“There’s all sorts of weird esoteric rules in New York City about separating cooking spaces from living spaces,” said Aufgang. “You shouldn’t sleep in a room where people are cooking.”
But aside from the technical hurdles, Aufgang said there are also grace notes, including the covered pool near the lobby that will soon be turned into a garden.
“It’s enclosed in glass,” said Aufgang. “It’s going to be a lovely garden.”
‘The two puzzle pieces fit together’
The idea of turning the city’s hotels into affordable housing gained ground among policymakers and housing advocates early in the pandemic when tourism nosedived, leaving hotels sitting empty. Joseph Loonam, the housing campaign coordinator at Vocal New York, said “robust conversations” were happening by the end of March 2020, when the pandemic shutdown was kicking into high gear
“It was hugely exciting and it had incredible potential,” said Blumsack of Neighbors Together. “There were all of these empty hotels just sitting there and all of these people who needed a safe place to stay due to COVID.”
“The two puzzle pieces fit together,” she said.
But there were different ideas about how to move ahead. Samuel Stein, a senior policy analyst at the Community Service Society, a social welfare organization, urged the state to buy the hotels.
“That was the way that the (HONDA) legislation was initially drafted,” said Stein. “And the response we got from the state government was, ‘that’s not our role. We don’t want to be in possession of real property.’ There was very little appetite from that for anybody.”
Instead, HONDA stipulated that at least 50% of the units go to homeless New Yorkers and required a nonprofit organization to purchase the site, either by itself or in partnership with a private developer. The state allotted funding to assist in the purchase, initially a $100 million fund that was eventually doubled.
But even that amount was inadequate, given how expensive New York commercial real estate is, said attorney Daniel M. Bernstein, who runs the Affordable Housing practice at Rosenberg & Estis, a law firm specializing in New York City real estate.
Bernstein said that $200 million “sounds like a lot, but in the context of developing affordable housing for low-income households, it’s actually only a couple of buildings worth, depending on the scale of the buildings,” and added that he’s advised eight to 10 clients on the matter.
Some hotel owners thought the subsidy was inadequate, he said, while other properties ran up against zoning regulations that made it hard to convert to housing.
“There were just a lot of headwinds,” he said.
In a statement, William Fowler, a spokesperson for the mayor, said, “the biggest barrier remaining to pursuing more hotel and office conversions — and other kinds of housing development, big and small — is the city’s outdated zoning laws, which is exactly why we’re working to change them.”
According to Dandapani of the Hotel Association of New York City, the thousands of migrants placed into hotel rooms by the city artificially inflated the hospitality industry, making hotels less susceptible to market forces.
“There are at this point some 15,000 odd rooms that are being catered to the migrant,” said Dandapani. “It’s obviously temporary. Nobody knows precisely how long it would last, but that has taken this inventory out of the market and resulted in compression, whereby other hotels that are not catering to the migrants can have better occupancies and better rates.”
Eventually, Blumsack said, “the interest was just not as much as we had really hoped,” and as the worst of the pandemic subsided, tourists began returning to the city and its hotels.
For many housing advocates, Baisley Pond Park is the exception that proves the rule about HONDA.
“The JFK conversion is great,” said Joseph Loonam of Vocal New York. “But ultimately, there’s just not enough motivation on the developer and on the government side to really get units online.”
Believers among the skeptics
While HONDA left many housing advocates frustrated, some people continue to hold out hope for the program.
For instance, Dandapani said the situation could change if migrants currently being housed in hotels move out, leaving behind properties that require expensive improvements.
“Whenever the migrants exit the hotels, the condition of the hotels is going to require substantial, and you can underline substantial, FF&E: that’s furniture, fixtures and equipment upgrades.”
Additionally, in her new budget deal Hochul included tax breaks for developers who take on office conversions if they agree to make at least 25% of the units affordable.
And a spokesperson for New York State Homes and Community Renewal, the state agency that oversees affordable housing, said that at least two more hotels are likely to be approved for conversions.
“HCR continues to work closely with nonprofit partners throughout the state who are seeking to convert distressed hotels and underutilized commercial buildings to the safe, modern, and affordable housing New Yorkers need,” said Charni Sochet, a spokesperson for HCR.
Schwartz of Slate Property Group is decidedly bullish on conversions, and despite his company’s considerable efforts to find an appropriate site in the JFK Hilton, estimated “there certainly are dozens and dozens of hotels that could be good candidates” across the five boroughs.
He predicted that HONDA would eventually win converts.
“When you do something new and innovative with government, there are a lot of people waiting to see if you can be successful,” he said.
The proof, he said, rested in Baisley Pond Park.
“A year from now we’ll see more of these,” he said.
The pursuit of new housing via conversion

The pursuit of new housing via conversion
Converting underutilized hotels and office buildings to residential require different approaches
By Ariel Aufgang
Ariel Aufgang is principal of Aufgang Architects, LLC.
We face a national housing shortage, while commercial property owners and investors contend with an oversupply of empty office space, as well as underutilized — and closed — hotels throughout the United States. As a result, owners and developers are increasingly considering commercial-to-residential conversions as a way to solve both problems.
U.S. cities that lead in converting office space to residential are metro Washington, D.C., with plans under way to convert office space into 5,820 apartment units, followed closely by the New York City metro area, with 5,215 new apartments planned from former office spaces.
Nearly four dozen commercial buildings are enrolled in NYC’s Office Conversion Accelerator and are expected to comprise more than 2,100 housing units.
New York State enacted the Housing Our Neighbors with Dignity Act to encourage the conversion of hotels and other commercial buildings into affordable housing. Throughout New York State there have been successful commercial-to-residential conversions in Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse and elsewhere. In Cohoes, N.Y., near Albany, Harmony Mills, a former textile industry site, was converted to apartments. In Albany, the old Union (train) Station is expected to be repurposed to residential.
There are a number of completed and proposed hotel-to-residential conversions in New York City. They include:
- The JFK Hilton Hotel
- Hotel Pennsylvania
- Paramount Hotel
- Best Western Hotel in Chinatown
- Towne Place Hotel in Queens
- Former Jehovah’s Witness’ hotel in Brooklyn
Also planned for a conversion to residential units is a vacant Sears Roebuck department store in Brooklyn and an office building at 25 Water St. in Lower Manhattan.
Hotels and office buildings present distinctly different issues to consider when evaluating the feasibility of potential residential conversion opportunities. Hotels have much different floorplans than office buildings, making hotel-to-residential conversion more practical and usually less costly. Multiple water and waste lines are already in place in hotels and can be modified relatively simply to convert a hotel building to apartment units. As a result, a hotel-to-residential conversion project can be completed faster and at a lower cost than an office building.
Hotel conversions are not without challenges. While some underutilized hotels are located in city centers, other potential conversion candidates are in less desirable locations next to airports or off major highways, far from residential communities — factors that can suppress the value and appeal of residential conversions.
Office buildings are usually located in city centers where many people work, with close access to public transportation, increasing their appeal as residential units, thus making them attractive to developers for conversion.
However, office-to-residential conversions often present costly design challenges. While office buildings often feature large windows not commonly used in residential design, they usually have deep footprints that deprive interior spaces of access to sunlight and outside air. This can be overcome through innovative design, such as creating an open core or atrium through the height of the building.
Also, elevators, stairways and systems such as water risers are usually centrally located in the cores of office buildings, requiring adding risers and lines to each new apartment unit. This increases conversion costs and lengthens construction time.
Commercial conversion to residential is a viable approach to increasing housing supply. Such adaptive reuse brings environmental benefits and makes financial sense.
These were the most active NYC architects in 2024

These were the most active NYC architects in 2024
By Holden Walter-Warner, Research by Matthew Elo
It’s been a chaotic year for New York developers and landlords — and as a result, for the city’s architects — with the real estate landscape being altered by state and city legislation, the whims of
office tenants and actions by the Federal Reserve.
Nikolai Katz Architect emerged as the most active firm of the year, in terms of its number of initial permit applications for projects above a certain size. With 15 such applications, it was one of only
three architects to hit double digits.
Many of Nikolai Katz’s projects were on the medium or small end of that spectrum. Other firms, such as SLCE Architects and Gensler, tackled fewer but larger projects. SLCE, for instance,
surpassed 2 million square feet across seven sizable projects.
The year was full of challenges for the industry. The interest rate environment remained largely unforgiving, the state replaced the 421a multifamily tax break with 485x and changed the rules for
office conversions, while the city passed its most sweeping zoning overhaul since 1961.
Meanwhile, development sites in New York City became even harder to find.
“The scarcity of parcels for multifamily real estate development is increasingly difficult,” said Ariel Aufgang of Aufgang Architects.
But there’s hope on the horizon. Architects contact by The Real Deal noted the significance of the City of Yes legislation, which loosened zoning restrictions and increased the density allowed for
multifamily developments.
TRD’s most active architects ranking for 2024 is based on the number of initial permit applications filed for new buildings and renovations. It reflects the architects of record on permit applications filed through Dec. 3 for projects of 10,000 square feet or more.
T-7. Aufgang Architects | 6 applications | 1.1 million sf
Ariel Aufgang’s firm has a hand in planning, designing and constructing developments across the tri-state region, and has appeared on year-end rankings for most active developers. This year’s filings included a 296,000-square-foot, mixed-use property in Brownsville and a 73-unit, mixed-use building at 132 East 125th Street in Harlem, which Maddd Equities is developing.
The firm recently launched a luxury division, Aurae, to meet what it sees as a growing interest in luxury multifamily developments and “bespoke individual homes,” accordin
AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIRES A NATIONAL COMMITMENT AND A CONVERGENCE OF URBAN PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESILIENCY

Affordable Housing Requires a National Commitment and a Convergence of Urban Planning and Environmental Resiliency
A Federal Workforce Housing Czar is Crucial in Solving the Nation’s Housing Crisis
By Ariel Aufgang, AIA, Principal of Aufgang Architects
Despite universal recognition of an intractable national affordable housing crisis, not enough is being done to find and implement effective solutions.
According to JP Morgan Chase, “across the country, (housing) supply is scarce and prices continue to soar. Most people employed in full-time, minimum-wage jobs can’t afford to rent even a modest two-bedroom apartment—in any state in the country.”
The new administration in Washington, DC, has a historic opportunity to initiate effective new approaches to increase access to affordable housing. No specific policies have been revealed, but it is anticipated that the focus will be on the supply side. This is not surprising considering the real estate development background of the Chief Executive.
Solutions to this crisis require a multifaceted approach to overcome its deep-rooted causes. The new administration in Washington can get off the blocks quickly by making creation of workforce housing a national priority, with a determination comparable to landing Americans on the moon and bringing them safely home.
According to a recent analysis by the Center for American Progress, “Smart federal policy that addresses both housing and climate change is necessary to achieve a sustainable, healthy and inclusive economy that works for everyone… ”The appointment of a federal Workforce Housing Czar would be crucial in marshaling and focusing federal agency support and funding, coordinated with state and local initiatives. The Workforce Housing Czar would facilitate public-private partnerships comprised of private sector developers and financial institutions, nonprofits devoted to expanding affordable housing opportunities and government agencies at all levels. This must be done with the speed and scale required to achieve meaningful results.
It would ensure that the impact of existing programs is maximized by bringing together government, nonprofit and private-sector firms that are too often siloed. Chief among impediments to affordable housing development is NIMBYism, perpetuated by restrictive zoning regulations that limit multifamily density, and other provisions that inhibit development of affordable housing.
In New York State, while the Legislature has missed opportunities to address policy, programs and funding to significantly increase the supply of new and preserved income restricted housing, it did pass a State budget including the Governor’s ambitious plan to create half a million new housing units over five years.
In New York City the Mayor’s proposed “City of Yes” initiative would revise zoning codes to allow increased density and streamline the City’s slow and complex permitting processes that stall projects for years as their costs pile up. The New York City Council has come up with its own version of this proposed plan, which it may approve by the end of the year.
New York City rents have reached new historic highs in several boroughs. The gap continues to widen between housing costs and income. NYC households need at least $100,000 a year for food, housing and transportation. Families of four need fifty percent more. But the median income is $55,000.
To keep housing costs below the recommended 30% of income, the average New York City renter must earn about $134,000 per year. Yet about a third of New York renters spend more than half of their income on rent. This situation is unsustainable and jeopardizes the economic and social fabric of our communities.
Several states, counties and municipalities have begun using innovative approaches to encourage and incentivize affordable housing development and preservation. Many of these provisions call for financial consequences on jurisdictions and developers that refuse to comply, applying a carrot and stick approach.
In Florida, for example, new regulations aim at clearing away impediments to the creation of much needed workforce and affordable housing. New state laws there are specifically designed to ease density restrictions and overcome political resistance that sustain NIMBYism in counties and towns across the state, while at the same time providing financial incentives to encourage communities to allow the development of affordable housing.
Florida’s Live Local Act addresses the state’s entrenched affordable housing crisis. Enacted in July 2023, it facilitates denser housing development on cheaper land, chiefly by limiting the authority of local governments to block affordable housing with zoning and density regulations.
The Live Local Act permits construction of multifamily housing on any commercial parcel if enough of the units are dedicated to affordable or workforce housing. Developers in Florida are now able to use the maximum zoning allowed within a one-mile radius of the site, without having to contend with protracted and costly rezoning applications.
Such creative regulations expand income restricted housing supply by boosting funding for housing and rental programs, adding incentives for housing investment and encouraging mixed-use development in financially distressed commercial areas. Also, in this high-interest rate environment faster zoning and building permit approvals reduce interest costs, thus allowing the creation of more affordable units.
The Live Local Act requires that local governments in Florida must approve–without public hearings, a rezoning process, or land use change requirements–housing development on sites zoned commercial, industrial or mixed use, if at least 40 percent of the residential units are affordable for at least 30 years to households making a maximum of 120 percent of the area median income. It also reduces local authority to impose density and height limits. There are few other restrictions. The market rate units can be rental or condo, and they may be separated from affordable units.
This innovative approach by the state is encouraging counties and municipalities to also act on their own to revise zoning regulations in harmony with new statewide programs, amplifying the impact of income restricted housing development programs.
Florida is not alone in coming up with creative approaches to increase the supply of affordable and workforce housing. Successful programs are underway in California, in the Los Angeles and Bay areas, as a well as in Colorado and in towns in Westchester County, NY, and other states.
Harnessing America’s awesome collective talent and resources in finance, architecture and urban planning, commercial real estate development and public and social policy, requires clarity of vision and the political will on the part of our elected officials to quickly address our affordable housing crisis through new policies and programs.
Discussions of affordable housing development must also address the roles of urban planning and environmental sustainability which overlap to a meaningful degree.
According to archeologists, urban planning may date back to the Mesopotamian civilization. It is recognized that the ancient Egyptians utilized rudimentary urban planning techniques, and there is no question that the Romans took sophisticated approaches to urban planning. These include the utilization of wetlands to drain off tidal flooding from low lying cities, including Rome, and impressive infrastructure including the famous Roman aqueducts and laying out city streets to facilitate regular large deliveries of agricultural and other goods.
Cobblestone roads around the Imperial Roman Forum are rutted from the wheels of carts that delivered heavy loads of agricultural products brought to shops and markets in the city.
Today, modern environmental sustainability combined with urban planning can be seen in Edgemere Commons under construction in New York City. Developed on more than 9 acres in the Rockaway Peninsula in Queens, it is a 100% affordable planned community of 11 buildings with over 2,000 units in an area historically vulnerable to tidal flooding, especially when driven by hurricanes, which are occurring with greater frequency and intensity. My firm, Aufgang Architects, created an urban plan for Edgemere Commons, and designed individual buildings in that community. The features we specified to improve environmental resiliency ranged from raising mechanical systems above flood levels, directing storm water to run off into wetlands and incorporating green roofs to reduce heat island effects. Our urban planning for Edgemere Commons also includes features that improve the quality of life for its residents, such as inviting walkable paths with attractive trees and plantings and benches in central gathering places that increase outdoor social contact among residents.
Another impressive example that combines urban planning with robust environmental resiliency is Babcock Ranch near Ft. Myers, Florida, which suffered little damage when Hurricane Milton rushed ashore earlier this year. Babcock Ranch was designed to withstand increasingly fierce storms. (My firm was not involved in the design of Babcock Ranch.)
Babcock Ranch prioritizes sustainability and resiliency, featuring walkable villages that foster a strong sense of community.
All of the structures at Babcock Ranch are built to withstand 150 mph hurricane force winds. Its 150-megawatt solar farms and underground transmission system ensure the community rarely loses electricity. Nearly 90% of the site is preserved wetland that helps collect excess water.
The United States is the first and only country to land men on the moon and bring them back. That was over a half century ago and resulted from a national commitment. Today we face new challenges here at home. The same energy, focus and determined national commitment must be applied to expanding access to safe, comfortable and resilient housing for all Americans. We have the ingenuity, treasury and drive required to achieve this crucial goal.
For additional information: www.aufgang.com/
NEW AFFORDABLE MULTIFAMILY MIXED-USE CONDO IN THE HEART TO HARLEM TO BRING HOME OWNERSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

New Affordable Multifamily Mixed-Use Condo in the Heart of Harlem to Bring Home Ownership Opportunities
A 73-unit affordable mixed-use condominium will be constructed at 132 East 125 Street at Lexington Avenue, bringing home ownership opportunities to the heart of Harlem.
Developed by Maddd Equities and designed by Aufgang Architects, the 13-story building will include 7,000 square feet of ground floor retail space and 45,000 square feet of medical offices on the second through fifth floors.
“We are pleased to enable affordable home ownership at one of the most vital intersections in Harlem,” said Ariel Aufgang, Principal of Aufgang Architects. “Homeownership strengthens the economic and social fabric of communities.”
“The new condo will feature larger apartments than usually found in new affordable residential construction in Manhattan, as well as an array of energy saving and environmentally sustainable features,” said Aufgang. “The new Harlem condo will provide residents with many appealing amenities.”
Of the 73 condo units, 31 will be 1-bedroom, 38 will be 2-bedroom and 4 3-bedroom units.
The development will meet HPD Homeownership Program guidelines for affordable condos, which calls for larger units than other programs. The units will be approximately 100 square feet larger than other HPD affordable programs.
Key features include:
- The building will be all electric, in compliance with Enterprise Green Communities criteria.
- Outdoor recreation space along with a fitness center and co-working space/lounge.
- Residents’ quiet enjoyment of their homes will be enhanced by the installation of window/wall noise attenuation materials and alternate means of ventilation.
“The anticipated approval of the City of Yes, providing measures to develop additional affordable housing throughout the City, underscores the importance of first in class affordable homeownership, such as this multifamily project in Harlem,” said Aufgang.
In the past 22 years Aufgang Architects has designed more than 14,000 units of affordable housing and 20 million square feet of built space.
Aufgang Architects is a certified Minority Business Enterprise.
Developers Want to Convert Unused Offices into Housing
Developers want to convert unused offices into housing— here’s what’s stopping them
By Lois Weiss
It’s a problem with an obvious solution. Since there are not enough cheap apartments at the same time many city offices remain empty, it would make sense to convert those fi distressed office towers into housing. But it’s not so simple.
Conversion projects are hugely complex, expensive, time-consuming and are stymied by bot city and state zoning and regulations. And without gobs of government assistance, the number don’t equate to cheap rentals.
Just look at Slate’s now underway conversion of the Hilton New York JFK Airport. Although the area was not conducive to pricey condos or market rents, thanks to a new program with financial and tax breaks, it will have 100% affordable housing with support services, said Ariel Aufgang, AIA, principal of Aufgang Architects, who designed the conversion. Without that government assistance, the Hilton would have sat empty.
At December’s announcement, Mayor Eric Adams said: “Advancing this plan to turn a vacant hotel into more than 300 new, affordable homes is a sign that we can think outside of the box and take advantage of the opportunities in front of us.”
But thinking is just not enough. Gov. Kathy Hochul has proposed both tax incentives and large buildings in some nabes. Similarly, Mayor Adams wants to allow offices built before 1990 convert and permit interspersed living and working. But Albany and City Council legislators must agree and have the changes blessed through the city’s Uniform Land Use Review Process (ULURP) that could take nearly a year.
The Real Estate Board of New York must also settle with unions on higher construction salaries.
“The city could change some requirements instantly, but they will say it will take six to nine months,” said Jay Neveloff, head of real estate at the law firm Kramer Levin.
Other issues include snaking water pipes and waste lines from those clustered at the core of office buildings. “If your building is wide open and empty, there is a clear path,” explain SIMS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gerard Nocera of Revolution Real Estate. “But if you have tenants with long-term leases, to reworks your core with existing tenants is an impossibility.”
Lenders must also approve the change of use as it is contrary to mortgage documents.
For now, most conversions are expected to take place in slender and vacant old buildings and those with tenants just on the lower floors.
Those most well-suited are prewar, Class C proper8es, explained Woody Heller of Branton Realty, as they have narrow floors or bases with towers stacked like wedding cakes with smaller floors on top.
Meanwhile, full- and half-block buildings, even topped by a tower — such as 750 Third Ave. — become complex architectural puzzles. “We’re teed up to convert the building to residen8al but need tax support,” said owner SL Green’s Steve Durels. “We have to make structural changes and have a design in the can. It would add hundreds of apartments.”
The city’s most an8cipated conversion is of the famed Fla8ron Building at 175 Fifth. After its small, triangular floors failed to attract office tenants, it’s now slated for a luxury residential conversion led by Daniel Brodsky, Jeff Gural and the Sorgente Group.
The largest underway is by Gural’s company, GFP Real Estate, along with conversion powerhouse Nathan Berman’s MetroLoft Management, who, with architects CetraRuddy, are transforming the 1.1 million-square-foot 25 Water St. with new windows, ameni8es, atriums and glass floors on top.
GFP is also buying 222 Broadway for $150 million for yet another office-to-resi transforma8on while MetroLoft is planning a residen8al redo at Pfizer’s former headquarters at 219 E. 42nd St. at Second Avenue.
Downtown, architect Robert Fuller of Gensler, who worked on Vanbarton Group’s 180 and 160 Water St., said, “The biggest challenge was the deep floorplates.” At 160 Water, now known as Peal House, long-empty shajs were cut ver8cally through the building and five new floors were added on top.
Vanbarton bought that building in 2014 for $160 million — roughly $333 per foot — and could afford the costs while targe8ng just under market rate rents.
“We have a spectacular basis and have been able to do this conversion incredibly efficiently and therefore we are passing along the benefits to the consumers and the demand [for apartments] reflects that,” said Richard Coles of Vanbarton.
Not every developer is so lucky, as some office sellers want what converters say are “unrealis8c” prices.Other buildings expected to take the conversion plunge include 185 Varick St. and 95 Madison Ave.
At 250 Park Ave., on the market through Newmark, lease clauses allow tenants to be booted. Nevertheless, it may simply be torn down and redeveloped to match its neighboring and gigantic new JPMorgan Chase office building.
“It is clearly simpler and faster to rip down and build what you want,” Neveloff said.
Hotel vs. Office: Different Challenges in Commercial to Residential Conversions
Hotel vs. Office: Different Challenges in Commercial to Residential conversions
Two potential solutions to the housing shortage comes in converting underutilized spaces like hotels and office buildings. However, each conversio type faces unique challenges and should be tackled accordingly
BY ARIEL AUFGANG, AIA, PRINCIPAL, AUFGANG ARCHITECTS
There’s a national housing shortage, both market rate and affordable housing. At the same time there’s a large supply of empty office space and underutilized—and close hotels across the country. Owners and developers are increasingly examining the viability of commercial to residential conversions as a solution to both problems.
Hotels and office buildings present distinctly different factors to consider whe evaluating the feasibility of potential residential conversion opportunities.
Issues with Hotel-to-Residential Conversions
Hotels have a distinct floorplan compared to office buildings that makes hotel-tor residential conversion more practical and less costly. Systems such as water and wa lines are already in place and can usually be relatively simple to modify them in converting a hotel building to apartments units. As a result, a hotel conversion project can be completed faster and at a lower cost than converting an office building t residential.
Hotel conversions are not without challenges. “While some underutilized hotels are located in city centers, other potential conversion candidates are in less desirable locations next to airports or off major highways far from residential communities— factors that can suppress the value and appeal of residential conversions,” said Chris Walker, Planning and Community Development Project Manager, Aufgang Architects.
These issues can be of less concern in converting hotels to affordable or supportive housing rather than market rate.
Walker was on the Aufgang team that designed the residential conversion of the 36 year old former JFK Airport Hilton Hotel in Queens, the first hotel-to-residential conversion i NYC.
The shuttered 350-key hotel was converted to the new Baisley Pond Park Residences, a 100% affordable, 318-unit multifamily building offering supportive services to lowincome and formerly homeless families and individuals. The Baisley Pond Park Residences was developed by Slate Property Group and the nonprofit RiseBor Community Partnership.
Issues with Office-to-Residential Conversions
Office buildings are usually located in city centers where many people work, with clos access to public transportation, increasing their appeal as residential units, thus making them attractive to developers for conversion.
However, office-to-residential conversions often present design challenges that can b costly to address. Office buildings, despite large windows not commonly used i residential design, usually have deep footprints which deprive interior spaces of access to sunlight and outside air.
This can be overcome through innovative design, such as creating an open core or atrium through the height of the building. Also, elevators, stairways and systems such as water risers are usually centrally located in the cores of office buildings, requirin adding risers and lines to each new apartment unit, which increases conversion costs and lengthens construction time.
About Aufgang Architects
Established in 1971 Aufgang Architects is a certified New York City and New York Stat Minority Business Enterprise. In the past 22 years the firm has designed and consulte on more than 20 million sf of built space, including over 14,000 units of affordable housing
ONE SOLUTION TO E-BIKE FIRES: BUILD A BETTER BIKE STORAGE ROOM

One Solution to E-Bike Fires: Build a Better Bike-Storage Room
By Bill Morris
Many co-op and condo boards are wrestling with the best way to protect their buildings and neighbors from the recent rash of fires caused by improperly charged lithium-ion batteries on e-bikes and other mobility devices. The advice they get is often confusing.
Some lawyers are urging boards to pass a house rule banning any device powered by a lithium-ion battery — a change that requires a simple majority vote of the board rather than approval by a super-majority of residents that’s required when altering a co-op’s proprietary lease or a condo’s bylaws. Some lawyers advise holding violators responsible for any ensuing fire, while others advise exempting owners of motorized wheelchairs from the ban.
The city council has also gotten into the act. Using the reasoning that the fires are caused by the improper charging of shoddy batteries, one bill before the council would ban the sale of lithium-ion batteries that aren’t certified by a nationally recognized testing laboratory, such as Underwriters Laboratories or Environmental Testing Laboratories. Another bill would ban second-hand lithium-ion batteries that have been reconstructed or rebuilt using cells recovered from used batteries. Those cheaper batteries are favored by the city’s army of delivery riders. Some form of new law is expected to pass in the coming months.
Meanwhile, the Fire Department of New York has responded to the spike in battery-related fires — which rose from 44 in 2020 to nearly 200 last year, resulting in six deaths. The FDNY has posted advisories in apartment buildings, urging people not to charge lithium-ion batteries inside apartments and to be sure to plug chargers directly into wall outlets, not extension cords or power strips.
And now the firm of Aufgang Architects has come up with yet another solution: built a better bike-storage room.
“We asked ourselves how we can improve existing designs to mitigate the threat of fire to residents of these buildings,” says Sam LaMontanaro, the director of engineering at Aufgang. So the firm’s engineering team set about designing a bike-storage room that could be incorporated into new construction or retrofitted into an existing building.
“We designed a bike storage room for apartment buildings that is fully encapsulated within cinderblock to contain and limit the potential for fire and heat spread,” LaMontanaro says. “As the first line of defense, sprinklers will slow the spread of fire allowing time for firefighters to get to the site. To maximize sprinkler speed and effectiveness, our design increases their density within the bike room.”
The design also specifies smoke and heat detectors, including infrared sensors, that trigger fire alarms and alert building staff in the event of a fire in the bike room. The doors are fire-rated. To ensure proper recharging of batteries, the room is fitted with electrical outlets fed by dedicated circuits so there is no need for power strips or extension cords and no additional strain on the feeds to residential and common areas. Incorporating such a bike-storage room into a new building would add minimal cost, LaMontanaro says, while retrofitting one into a 60-unit building would cost about $25,000.
The board’s work does not stop with installing such a storage room. “Part of this is a behavioral issue, and education is paramount,” LaMontanaro says. “E-bikes are expensive, and some people are a bit nervous about storing them in a public area. So there has to be good security — locks, maybe cameras. And people have to be made to realize that storing and charging bikes inside apartments can be dangerous. If there has to be some type of penalty for violators, maybe that has to be part of it. Co-op and condo boards can exert pressure on residents — and they have to make people realize that this is serious.”
Link to Orignal Article:
One Solution to E-Bike Fires: Build a Better Bike-Storage Room
E-BIKES ARE CONVENIENT. THEY CAN ALSO CATCH FIRE AND DESTROY BUILDINGS
E-Bikes Are Convenient. They Can Also
Catch Fire and Destroy Buildings
Three years after New York legalized micro-mobility bikes and scooters,
lawmakers and building managers are grappling with how to make them
safer, after numerous fires, some fatal.
By Joyce Cohen
Just before midnight on a Fri day in January, a fire tore through a three-story house in East Elmhurst, Queens, injuring 10 people inside and killing a 63-year-old man who was trapped on the second floor. Five days later, on a rainy Wednesday afternoon, another fire broke out in the basement of a house in Forest Hills, Queens, where an unauthorized day care center was housed. Eighteen children were injured, one seriously.
The cause of both fires was rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, which power the e-bikes and e-scooters that have become ubiquitous on city streets, according to the New York Fire Department.
Jose Corona, whose e-scooter sparked the deadly fire in East Elmhurst, told reporters that he heard an explosion shortly after parking the scooter on the first floor of the house. “Once I opened the door, on the second floor the stairs was already on fire in seconds,” he said.
The use of micro-mobility vehicles surged during the pandemic as New Yorkers shunned public transportation and ordered food from delivery apps rather than crowd into restaurants.
Delivery workers are increasingly reliant on e-bikes, which allow them to go farther and faster to meet the demand.
But a deadly, unintended consequence has emerged: Storing and charging such bikes and scooters indoors can create a tinderbox. Last year, the batteries caused 216 fires, with 147 injuries and six deaths. As of Feb. 27 this year, they were responsible for 30 fires, 40 injuries and two deaths, according to the Fire Department.
Nearly three years after New York City legalized the use of micro-mobility vehicles, building managers and lawmakers are grappling with how to prevent battery fires, with some calling for prohibitions on e-bikes and e-scooters, at least until ways to minimize the risks have been established.
Last week, the City Council took what it called “a first step in mitigating the fire risk posed by lithium-ion batteries,” approving a spate of bills that would include new safety and certification standards, education campaigns on how to prevent fires, and restrictions on the use and sale of used or reassembled batteries.
That, experts say, is where much of the danger lies — from off-market, refurbished, damaged or improperly charged batteries. A chemical reaction inside the self-fueling battery can spark a “thermal runaway,” which occurs when the lithium-ion cell enters a volatile, self-heating state. The fires are also difficult to extinguish (the Fire Department warns against using fire extinguishers or water), often spreading to nearby batteries, and can even reignite hours later.
“All it takes is for one small battery cell to be defective, overcharged or damaged, and a tremendous amount of energy is released in the form of heat and toxic flammable gases all at once,” said Daniel Murray, the Fire Department’s chief of hazmat operations.
The Fire Department started tracking fires caused by lithium-ion batteries in 2019, “when we recognized we had a problem,” Mr. Murray said. That year, the department recorded 28 fires resulting in 16 injuries — a number that has skyrocketed with the proliferation of the bikes and scooters.
Lithium-ion batteries can be found in computers, cellphones and some household devices, but micro-mobility vehicle batteries are bigger and “are subject to a lot of wear and tear and weather, which tends to damage them,” Mr. Murray said. “So that’s why we are seeing a lot of fires specifically in the bikes and scooters.”
Battery fires have broken out in a range of buildings around New York, from public housing complexes to luxury towers.
“I didn’t even know I was supposed to be afraid of the e-bike battery-charging station on the ground floor,” said Gail Ingram, who until last June lived above a pedicab and bike-rental business in a Hell’s Kitchen walk-up. One morning, she “heard a woman screaming” outside. Then she saw smoke rising from the floorboards.
The stairwell was quickly consumed by smoke that scorched her eyeballs. “I’ve never felt such a terrifying feeling, not being able to breathe,” said Ms. Ingram, 51, a nurse practitioner.
No one was seriously injured, though Ms. Ingram lost almost everything. Unlike most of her neighbors, she had renter’s insurance, which is now paying for her to live in a tiny hotel room with her two cats. “I’m still going through boxes of non-salvageable keepsakes and water-soaked paperwork,” she said.
Ms. Ingram’s upstairs neighbor, Madison Coller, 26, who works in risk management for a payment-processing company, was on the third floor when the fire broke out. She recalled a harrowing day, awakening from a nap and fleeing after she smelled smoke and heard a voice yelling, “Fire!” Displaced by the fire and having no insurance, she stayed with her brother in Bushwick and moved back to Rochester for a short while. Battery-powered vehicles “should be banned until there is a safer solution in place, because too many people have lost their lives,” said Ms. Coller, who now lives in Bushwick.
Some buildings have already taken that action. Last November, dozens of people were injured in a luxury high-rise rental building on East 52nd Street when a battery exploded in an apartment doubling as an unauthorized bike-repair shop. The incident spurred Glenwood Management, which operates more than two dozen luxury rental buildings in the city (though not that one), to ban e-bikes and e-scooters in all its buildings. “If you have one,” the company wrote in a notice to tenants, “we ask that you remove it at once from your apartment.”
A few months earlier, the New York City Housing Authority had proposed a ban on storing and charging e-vehicles in all 335 of its building developments, to prevent fires and preserve the health and safety of residents.” After an outcry by residents opposing the ban, the agency decided to pause and revisit the issue.
“Some buildings are taking the approach of a complete ban on e-bikes, and other buildings aren’t doing anything, and then there are those buildings in the middle that are trying to regulate and pass rules that kind of split the baby,” said Leni Morrison Cummings, a lawyer at the firm of Cozen O’Connor, who represents condominium and co-op boards. “At first we saw all the buildings that jumped on the bandwagon with the ban. Now I am seeing buildings trying compromise positions.”
Proposals include requiring residents to register their e-bikes. Others call for fire-safe bike rooms in apartment buildings and more education about battery safety.
“It’s a conversation buildings need to have: How do we limit the risk?” said Eric Wohl, a lawyer representing condo and co-op boards at the firm Armstrong Teasdale. “Unit owners are allowed to have candles, and that’s a fire risk, too.”
Drake Chan initially used a kick scooter to commute from his condo on the Upper East Side, cutting his long walk to and from the subway. He bought an e-scooter last year.
“You get places faster, and it saved me in terms of sweating it out during the summer,” said Mr. Chan, 37, who works as a project engineer in the field of transportation. “It can also carry quite a bit. I can put two bags of groceries on each handlebar.”
So when his condo board recently considered banning e-bikes and e-scooters in his building, he persuaded the board members to reconsider, emphasizing that most lithium-ion fires are caused by low-quality or misused batteries. “I encouraged them to look into registering all e-bikes and e-scooters, so we know what we have on our hands,” Mr. Chan said.
He also urged the board to educate residents on safe battery use, including charging the batteries only while attended (never overnight), keeping flammable materials away, and using the manufacturer’s original cords and chargers.
Another potential solution is safer bike rooms. Ariel Aufgang, a New York-based architect and the principal at Aufgang Architects, has designed one using cinder blocks, upgraded electrical outlets and additional sprinkler heads. “Government moves too slowly,” he said. “These safety measures are a no-brainer.”
But some building managers question why the burden of safeguarding against battery fires should fall on them. “To me, the issue is product safety,” said Michael Rothschild, the president of the residential management firm AJ Clarke.
Someone shopping for a bike or battery “isn’t going to know if the battery is poorly made,” he said. “There should be an oversight agency to make sure what’s being sold is safe. That’s the way we handle most things.”
Last month, Laura Kavanagh, New York’s fire commissioner, sent a letter to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, saying the department was “on the front lines of this fight against deadly fires involving batteries in e-micromobility devices,” and urging the government to promote more safety regulations, including seizing imported batteries that fall short of industry standards, penalizing manufacturers who fail to inform authorities about product hazards, and recalling unsafe devices. She also recommended a ban on sales of “universal” battery chargers.
City lawmakers are just beginning to catch up. As part of the legislative package the City Council approved last week, Gale Brewer, a council member who represents the Upper West Side, has sponsored a bill that would require the fire department, in consultation with the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, to develop an information campaign about the fire risks. Ms. Brewer proposed a bill in November that would “ban the sale of second-use batteries, those which are reconditioned or manipulated and sold on the secondary market,” according to her office.
“Older residents call me all the time. ‘There’s a bike in my building.’ They are very nervous,” Ms. Brewer said. “We have to do something about this issue because more people will die.”
Oswald Feliz, a council member who represents some neighborhoods in Bronx, has also introduced a bill that would impose “recognized safety standard certification” and require an micro-mobility vehicle to be certified in order to be sold in New York City. Another member of the council, Robert F. Holden of Queens, recently introduced a bill that would temporarily ban certain e-bikes and e-scooters throughout New York City.
“Right now, these batteries are killing people, and that’s why we have to do something drastic, or it’s going to continue,” Mr. Holden said. “I don’t want to not allow them forever. It’s only a pause until we get back to the drawing board and get the proper safeguards on them.”
Some of the proposed legislation focuses on the thousands of delivery workers who have come to rely on e-bikes to make a living. One bill would require the consumer and worker protection agency to distribute educational materials on e-bike safety for delivery workers in their language.
“I worry about the delivery people,” Ms. Brewer said. “They need support. They go through a lot of batteries because they are working on the street.”
New lithium-ion bike batteries typically cost at least $300 (and often much more), forcing many riders to turn to lower-quality products. “There is definitely a market where people don’t want to spend that,” said Mr. Wohl of Armstrong Teasdale. “Delivery guys don’t have a lot of money and they want to go as fast as they can because the more trips, the more tips.”
Los Deliveristas Unidos, a guild representing 65,000 app-based food delivery workers, is pressing the city to boost the e-bike infrastructure to include charging and parking stations, along with bathrooms, something that Mayor Eric Adams and Senator Chuck Schumer have pledged to do.
Ligia Guallpa, director of the Worker’s Justice Project, which oversees Los Deliveristas Unidos, said that e-bikes are invaluable in low-income communities that lack accessible transportation, and that without sufficient charging stations, many have no better option than to charge their e-bikes at home.
“Banning e-bikes from buildings without offering an alternative is not the right solution,” she said. “Low-income New Yorkers don’t ride a bike as a fun activity. These e-bikes are legal and people are using them as a way of survival.”
Link to Orignal Article:
E-Bikes Are Convenient. They Can Also Catch Fire and Destroy Buildings.

